July 24, 2026 — For roughly fifty cents of plastic filament and a few hours of machine time, a hobbyist at home can now print a toothy little elf that looks unmistakably like Labubu, the blind-box collectible that turned China's Pop Mart into one of the most valuable toy companies on earth. That single fact — a beloved designer toy reduced to a downloadable file — is why the world's hottest toymaker and the world's hottest 3D-printer brand are now headed to court. And it captures a larger collision reshaping the trendy-toy business: the same desktop 3D-printing revolution that democratized making has arrived at the doorstep of the art-toy gold rush.
The affordable desktop 3D printer has turned collectible-making from a factory process into a bedroom hobby.
The flashpoint is a lawsuit that reads like a parable for the whole industry. Pop Mart has sued Bambu Lab — the Shenzhen firm formally known as Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology — along with two affiliates, including the operator of its model-sharing platform MakerWorld, alleging that user-uploaded Labubu design files infringe its rights of reproduction, distribution and online dissemination. The case is set for trial at the People's Court of Pudong New Area in Shanghai on April 2, 2026, and its central question is one that will echo far beyond a single elf-faced doll: does a platform that merely hosts files its users upload enjoy the "safe harbor" protection that shields it from what those users do?
The economics are what make the dispute so combustible. A genuine Labubu blind box retails for roughly US$20–30, with the rarest "secret" figures pulled at odds of about one in seventy-two. A home-printed version in ordinary PLA plastic reportedly costs around fifty cents in material. Labubu-inspired files already circulate on MakerWorld, Cults3D and Creality Cloud, and no factory, shipping container or customs checkpoint stands between the design and the finished toy — only a printer humming quietly on a desk.
Pop-culture figures fresh off a consumer printer — the kind of output now colliding with licensed designer-toy brands.
None of this would matter if 3D printing were still a niche for engineers. It isn't. Bambu Lab, the brand at the center of the Pop Mart suit, says its printer unit sales tripled from 2024 to 2025, and the market-intelligence firm CONTEXT reports that Bambu became the world's number-one entry-level printer brand — machines under about US$2,500 — in 2025 with roughly a 37% share, overtaking longtime leader Creality. Entry-level shipments across the whole category rose about 26% for the full year, with Chinese makers accounting for the overwhelming majority of units.
Just as important is what those printers are fed. MakerWorld, Bambu's free model-sharing hub, reports on the order of ten million monthly active users, more than 2.6 million original 3D models and some 290 million print hours logged in 2025 alone. A whole native folk art has grown up there: "print-in-place" articulated toys — flexible dragons, axolotls, snakes and chameleons that emerge from the printer already jointed and wiggling, no assembly required. Designers such as Cinderwing3D built followings on these viral flexi-creatures, and their most popular files rack up tens of thousands of downloads apiece.
A "print-in-place" flexi toy arrives fully articulated straight off the print bed — the layer lines are part of its charm.
If the courtroom fight frames 3D printing as a threat, one high-profile experiment showed it could also be a product. In 2022 Hasbro, working with the printer company Formlabs, launched the Selfie Series: fans scanned their own face in the Hasbro Pulse app and received a personalized, 3D-printed head mounted on a collector-grade action figure body across lines including Star Wars, Marvel Legends, G.I. Joe, Power Rangers and Ghostbusters. The heads were printed on a fleet of more than thirty Formlabs SLA machines; the figures sold for US$59.99. It was one of the few times a major toymaker used 3D printing not for prototyping but for the finished, mass-customized product itself.
The experiment did not last. Hasbro discontinued the Selfie Series in late 2023, roughly fourteen months after launch, a reminder that turning a printer farm into a consumer service is operationally punishing. Most of the industry's giants remain more conservative: Mattel, for instance, uses 3D printers mainly to prototype Barbie, Hot Wheels and Fisher-Price toys internally, and has no consumer print-on-demand line. The lesson cuts both ways — the technology is compelling enough to try, and demanding enough that even the biggest players retreat.
The reason Pop Mart is willing to litigate becomes obvious in its ledger. The company reported 2024 revenue of about RMB 13.04 billion (roughly US$1.8 billion), up 106.9% year on year — and then in the first half of 2025 alone booked revenue of about RMB 13.88 billion (around US$1.93 billion), surpassing its entire 2024 in six months. The Monsters series, which includes Labubu, brought in about RMB 4.81 billion in that half-year, some 34.7% of total revenue. The character, created in 2015 by Hong Kong artist Kasing Lung, went supernova after BLACKPINK's Lisa was seen with one in early 2024; in June 2025 a human-sized, 131-centimeter Labubu sold for RMB 1.08 million — about US$150,000 — at a Beijing auction.
That value has already drawn a flood of fakes — but it is worth being precise about which kind. The mass-market counterfeit Labubus nicknamed "Lafufu" are injection-molded in unauthorized factories, not 3D-printed: Chinese customs reported seizing some 1.83 million counterfeit Labubu products in 2025, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection intercepted 11,134 fake dolls in a single August 2025 shipment mislabeled as "LED Bulb." Home 3D printing is a distinct and newer front in the same war — lower-volume and harder to seize at a border, because the "factory" is a machine in someone's spare room.
Designer collectibles have become a multibillion-dollar business — and a tempting target for both molded fakes and printable files.
The quality gap that once protected brands is closing. Consumer resin printers from makers such as Elegoo and Anycubic now start around US$299 and resolve detail down to roughly ten microns — fine enough for the crisp faces and smooth surfaces that collectors prize, and long the domain of tabletop-miniature specialists. On-demand services have tried to productize that capability: Hero Forge lets customers design custom 30-millimeter miniatures in the browser and ships them printed to order, having raised more than US$3 million on Kickstarter in 2020. Yet the model is volatile — Shapeways, a pioneer of on-demand printing founded in 2007, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in July 2024 before a relaunch under new owners.
For the trendy-toy industry, the April trial in Shanghai is less an endpoint than a bellwether. If platforms are found to enjoy safe harbor, brands will be pushed toward faster takedowns and watermarked, officially licensed files; if they are not, the model-sharing sites that power the hobby face a very different future. Some platforms are already moving: MakerWorld introduced a Creator Copyright Protection Program in late 2025 and says it acted against more than four thousand unauthorized re-uploads. The teddy bear, the blind box and the vinyl figure have always been objects you bought. The unsettled question of the coming year is what happens when they become, first and foremost, files — and who gets to decide when the printer is allowed to press "start."
Contact Us
